But the question that comes to mind is: can we legislate and regulate economic behaviour? Would it not look like trying to make hot air go down when the behaviour of hot air is to rise up? Economics, we are told, is a social science which studies human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses. So Economics studies, it does not Impose or force human behaviour.
In the Economic Environment of Business class, my teacher once asked us if a monopolist could charge whatever price he / she wanted. That was food for thought. First the mass trekking points to the inadequacy of buses for mass transit. So there is a market that okada riders have seen. Nature abhors a vacuum and in a free market economy, this is an opportunity for business. So the challenge will be to meet up with the current demand for an affordable means of mass transit. Perhaps a culture of ride sharing may evolve. This could reduce traffic congestion also if keeping okada out of that market will be sustained.
The basic economic forces are those of demand and supply. In a market where the demand exceeds supply, price goes up. This is an expected human behaviour in a free market economy. It remains to be seen whether a price control or a legislation on price will cause the interaction between demand and supply to change. It might be like forcing hot air to go down with a funnel.
Of course unless you condense the gas into some liquid , it will at the end of the funnel rise up again. So unless there is some statistics taken during this period and an estimate made across routes to enable planned intervention, prices are likely to go up in the face of surging demand. May be the trains will help change the equation. But the routes served by trains are limited and may not have the cooling effect needed to keep transport fares down.
Now back to my teacher’s question: can a monopolist ( now in this case a bus driver who has no competition from Okada riders) charge whatever he/ she feels like? This situation may attract some opportunistic “touch- and –go” business men who will come and contest the market with the monopolist. The problem with “touch- and –go” business men is that they are not registered businesses, incur little or no costs to enter the market, but will come contest the super normal profit of the monopolist. These types of businesses create safety and security risks. And where choices are limited and prices are high, this new breed of “ touch- and – go” businesses will, like in Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart, behave like the bird that says it has learnt to fly without perching since men have learnt to shoot without missing.
If the people perceive the new regulation as punitive and unfair, then it will be “ Us versus them” – the people and the new reincarnated business model versus the law enforcement agents. This early stage of okada ban provides the opportunity to resolve transportation challenges before other market players fill the vacuum and meet the need that is showing very plainly.
