Trouble in the Nigeria Exchange Group “NGX”
September 26, 2022566 views0 comments
Read Also:
- Leadway Group supports women's empowerment at SLA career fair 2024
- Ecobank opens market at London Stock Exchange to celebrate successful…
- Botched and bungled exercise that’s Nigeria’s 2025 budget
- Nigeria at 64, where individual comfort trumps national greatness (2)
- Inflation storm rages on in Nigeria as October rate hits 33.88%
Rebuttal to NGX statement of 20th September, 2022
This is another of NGX’s statements that does not say anything.
1. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance is not what you say, but what you do. If they insist, they have done the right thing, then let them agree to a forensic Audit to dig into why they spent N6.52 billion running the NGX in 2021, out of the N6.8 billion they earned in that year. One thing is clear from the desperate need to raise this money at this time. Something is being covered up.
Any experienced auditor will tell you that when numbers like these – N6.8 billion (revenue) Vs. N6.52 billion (expenses) – are so close to the edge, there are deferred expenses and liabilities that are hidden in those accounts. If they must raise money at all, let it be in 2025, to let these numbers rest properly.
Saying that they got approvals for all they are doing and obeyed corporate governance codes is self-serving, just like their self praise in the reports they sent to shareholders, until a closer look, beyond the surface, to see the rubbish beneath the hood.
2. VALUE OF SHARES AT LISTING
They are forgetting that market practitioners know and follow the market closely.
By the way, saying that the NGX shares were listed at N16.15 is to deny that the shares traded for N27.90 before it was delisted from NASD Securities Exchange, and re-listed on the NGX – so what was put on the offer document at demutualization has become irrelevant.
3. PROPOSED CAPITAL RAISE
Their reply has said nothing about why the N35 billion fund raise is necessary. Their statement said they are raising the huge fund for business expansion – to deepen investments into existing portfolio companies to ensure high and steady returns.
The only profitable company in their portfolio is CSCS – are they saying they need to take more money from shareholders to invest in CSCS, a company already owned by shareholders, to ensure high and steady returns?
These guys definitely have something up their sleeves, that they are not telling us.
They are saying that they are raising such a large amount to invest in CSCS – is this their “curated strategy” to guarantee returns to shareholders. Who told them shareholders want to invest in CSCS through them? Note, CSCS earns money from doing business with the NGX.
The larger question is why are they diversifying from the Exchange Business? Exchange Businesses are mostly profitable all over the world. Even our young FMDQ, their only competitor, is profitable. Are they saying they have run out of ideas? It seems so, because since the only experienced person in that executive management left, everything seems to have left with him.
He was responsible for putting the top technology we now have in the NGX in place. Since he left with his transformation term, the NGX has not been the same.
-
business a.m. commits to publishing a diversity of views, opinions and comments. It, therefore, welcomes your reaction to this and any of our articles via email: comment@businessamlive.com