The Nigerian financial value chain has been a mixed experience between the super top and the needy. There exist serious gaps in the Nigerian financial value chain – specifically from the perspective and experience of small businesses, particularly the MSMEs.
One of them is the policy gap. Slow implementation of government schemes persists. Support funds such as CBN/MSME funds, BOI, DBN are often bottlenecked by bureaucracy. Not only that, regulatory stability is yet to be achieved. Foreign exchange (FX) volatility, sudden policy shifts and unpredictable regulations discourage long-term financial planning.
Access gap is another type of gap encountered. There is limited access to affordable capital. Banks are often unwilling to lend to small businesses due to lack of collateral, short operating history, or inadequate record-keeping. Even when loans are available, MSMEs find the rates very high and the conditions stringent. There is also poor access to long-term finance. Most loans are short-tenured, making it hard to fund growth or capital projects.
The information gap comes in the form of financial illiteracy. Financial literacy among business owners is yet to improve. Many small business owners are unfamiliar with products like invoice discounting, leasing, insurance, and angel finance. There is a lack of visibility of financial products. MSMEs are often unaware of funding windows, credit schemes, or intervention funds that exist.
The trust gap has to do with trust deficit. Mutual distrust exists between financiers and MSMEs. Banks perceive MSMEs as high-risk. MSMEs view banks as exploitative or unhelpful. Some small businesses avoid formal finance to escape tax scrutiny, further isolating them from the value chain.
The capacity gap comes in the form of managerial ability and level of understanding. Poor financial records and management practices are persistent. Many MSMEs lack formal bookkeeping or audited statements, which limit their eligibility for finance. Weak governance structures make it difficult to pass due diligence by formal financial institutions. Most businesses have difficulties in meeting collateral and guarantee requirements.
The infrastructure gap has a pervasive impact on many different types of businesses in remarkable ways. Weak payment systems are still prevalent in rural areas. Cash-based transactions dominate, limiting uptake of digital finance services, partly due to infrastructure deficit. Network and electricity challenges persist. These disrupt smooth usage of Point of Sale (PoS), mobile banking and other financial channels, especially outside major cities.
The product fit gap is somehow intrinsic. Financial products are not well tailored to sector-specific working capital cycles, such as agriculture, retail or manufacturing. There are few alternative financing models. There is only limited use of factoring, supply-chain finance, crowdfunding, equity funding, merchant cash advances.
Communication gap sometimes has all-encompassing impacts. Lack of proper communication by lending institutions hinders effective handshake with small businesses. There are errors in approaches to fund recovery leading to a number of outcomes. Culture of fear and harassment prevails instead of engagement. Aversion to further borrowing becomes the norm. Negative impression, which is often misplaced. Failure to help borrowers out of the debt hole by proper advice or more lending when and where necessary to help stabilise and build stronger customers. Restrictions imposed by regulatory authorities, especially the automatic placement of defaulters’ names on Credit Bureau and how this closes doors temporarily on further borrowing. Seasonal businesses tend to be at a disadvantage as they may not fit into banks lending or borrowing templates.
Other communication-related problems include the unpredictability of the economy, changing values of the naira and rising cost of operations, no clear mandate for banks to build enterprises and thereby boost the economy. Misplaced priority in risk assessment and ranking can be found during buying and selling, especially importing. At industry level, the oil and gas businesses receive more favourable responses while agriculture gets less despite the higher risks of the former.
Here are some recommendations. First, strengthen rural digital infrastructure through public–private partnerships to enhance connectivity. Secondly, expand financial literacy programmes targeting women, youth, and rural populations using radio, vernacular and agent networks. Encourage innovation sandboxes for inclusive products such as agro-insurance, micro-pensions, asset-backed savings. Enhance agent supervision and consumer safeguards to build trust and reduce fraud. Finally, introduce tax incentives and risk-sharing facilities for institutions serving excluded populations.
In conclusion, closing these gaps is possible. But, for this to happen, Nigeria must deepen digital infrastructure, promote innovative inclusive products and enforce consumer protection frameworks. Aligning policy incentives with private sector innovations will be critical to delivering affordable, relevant financial services to every Nigerian.
- business a.m. commits to publishing a diversity of views, opinions and comments. It, therefore, welcomes your reaction to this and any of our articles via email: comment@businessamlive.com
