“I can calculate the movement of the stars, but not the madness of men” – Sir Isaac Newton
No need to hide, the South Sea Bubble of 1720 stands out as one of my favourite economic crises, if such a dark preference can be admitted. In the vast panorama of financial follies, few episodes are as instructive or as dramatic as this notorious bubble. It was a crisis fuelled by greed, ignorance, and political collusion, which captivated both the brightest minds and the dullest among the public of that era. This event continues to serve as one of the earliest and most illuminating lessons on the perils of unchecked speculation and unregulated financial markets.
Long before terms like ‘stock market’ and ‘investment bubble’ became part of everyday language, the South Sea Company provided Britain with a striking example of financial innovation intertwined with wild optimism and national scandal. Its rise and fall highlight the dangers inherent in speculative excess and the importance of prudent regulation, lessons that remain relevant even centuries later. The crisis not only reshaped the financial landscape but also offered a powerful cautionary tale about the hubris and recklessness that can accompany unfettered financial innovation.
Where did it all begin? By 1710, Britain’s national debt had grown to £9 million, a significant burden resulting from years of war. In 1711, the government established the South Sea Company (SSC) as part of a plan to convert debt: investors could exchange government bonds for company shares. In exchange, the SSC received exclusive trading rights with South America, especially in the lucrative slave trade under Spain’s Asiento agreement.
However, these trading rights were mainly illusory. Spain allowed only one ship per year to trade with its colonies, and the actual trading profits from 1713 to 1719 amounted to less than £200,000, which was minimal compared to the company’s inflated market value. Despite this, the SSC capitalised on promises of future profits to promote the idea of national wealth through finance rather than manufacturing or production.
The speculative frenzy reached its zenith in 1720, a year marked by widespread financial exuberance and risky ventures.
During this period, the company boldly proposed to take over the entire national debt, which at the time was approximately £31 million, by exchanging it for new shares. Promoters assured investors that this bold move would lead to a simultaneous increase in the nation’s wealth and individual fortunes.
To understand the dramatic rise and subsequent collapse, let’s examine the share prices from January to December of that year. In January 1720, shares were valued at £128; by April, they had soared to £330; in June, they skyrocketed further to £890; and late in June, they reached a peak of £1,000. However, by September, the share price had plummeted to just £150, and by December, it had fallen back to around £124.
This wild fluctuation resulted in the loss of over £500 million in today’s money within mere months. Ordinary citizens, caught up in the frenzy, mortgaged their homes, pawned their possessions, and borrowed at exorbitant rates to participate in the boom. Even members of parliament, bishops, and courtiers were swept up in the illusion of effortless wealth, disregarding the risks.
The mania also spawned numerous imitation schemes. Between February and July 1720 alone, over 190 new joint-stock companies were established, many of which had absurd or outright fraudulent purposes. One notorious prospectus even boasted of creating a company for carrying on an undertaking of great advantage, but nobody knew what it was, highlighting the reckless and deceptive nature of the speculative bubble.
The disasters described do not discriminate, unlike other life challenges; they respect no boundaries of age, gender, social class, or mental state.
When the crisis reached its peak, more than two-thirds of shareholders faced ruin, losing everything they had invested. Historical records from that period reveal that approximately £20 million, an amount equivalent to about £3.5 billion today, was wiped out across the entire economy.
Many families, having invested their life savings or dowries in hopes of a better future, found themselves suddenly destitute, facing severe financial hardship. Small businesses that relied heavily on accessible credit were forced to close, and the London money market experienced a complete freeze, further crippling economic activity.
Notable investors, including Sir Isaac Newton, yes, the genius who shares the apple-induced fame with Adam, Eve and the snake, was not immune to the national madness. He lost around £20,000 — equivalent to over £4 million today — the loss made him give us the deep reflections mentioned above. The Duchess of Cleveland was another who lost £40,000 and suffered devastating financial losses. The repercussions were not limited to individual investors; over 100 Members of Parliament were implicated in insider trading and speculative profiteering, highlighting the widespread nature of the scandal.
This collapse of trust and stability deeply eroded public confidence in both the government and the financial elite. Pamphleteers of the time condemned the events as “a national madness” and a “triumph of avarice over reason,” reflecting the deep societal outrage and disillusionment caused by the crisis.
To address the financial crisis, the government took decisive actions aimed at preventing a complete economic collapse. In September 1720, the Bank of England attempted to stabilise the situation by offering partial liquidity to the markets; however, it soon withdrew this support upon realising the extent of overvaluation in the market. By December 1720, Parliament stepped in with a comprehensive rescue plan, spearheaded by Sir Robert Walpole, who would later become Britain’s first de facto Prime Minister. His calm and steady leadership helped restore investor confidence and avert a full-scale economic depression. Walpole’s efforts earned him a mixture of criticism and praise, with many considering him the man who “saved the nation” during its time of crisis.
Key measures implemented during this period included compelling the East India Company and the Bank of England to absorb a portion of the South Sea Bubble’s vast debt, confiscating property from company directors to compensate aggrieved investors, and introducing stricter regulations on the formation of joint-stock companies through the enactment of the Bubble Act of 1720, aimed at curbing speculative excesses.
The South Sea Bubble of 1720 was not only a remarkable failure of rational judgment but also a pivotal moment in the history of capitalism. It compelled Britain to confront a stark choice: descend into chaos or undertake meaningful reform. In doing so, it helped shape the modern state’s complex relationship with the world of finance and investment.
This episode serves as an enduring warning across history: when the pursuit of profit morphs into pure fantasy, and political leaders sacrifice integrity for quick gains, financial collapse moves from being a rare possibility to an inevitable outcome. Such crises highlight the dangerous allure of speculative bubbles and the importance of prudent regulation.
Moreover, even the most intelligent and insightful individuals are not immune to collective madness. As Isaac Newton, one of the greatest minds of all time, reportedly lamented after losing a fortune in the bubble, even he could not escape the destructive influence of “the madness of men.” This timeless lesson reminds us that human nature remains susceptible to irrational exuberance and greed, posing ongoing challenges to sustainable economic stability.
Join me @anthonykila, if you can, to continue these conversations.
