The recent decision by the Federal Government of Nigeria to send 1, 200 bags of rice to each state as palliatives to alleviate the current hardship is a well-intentioned but insufficient gesture. At an estimated total cost of N2.2 billion for 44,000 bags of 25kg, the allocation per state is a mere N60 million, and per local government area (LGA), it is a paltry N3.3 million. This amount is unlikely to have a significant impact on the people.
To enhance the effectiveness of palliatives, the federal government should consider a collaborative approach with state and local governments, requiring them to contribute 50 percent and 25 percent, respectively, to match the federal government’s efforts. This would increase the total sum to N5.8 million per LGA, making a more meaningful impact on the people.
Moreover, the distribution process is often marred by political interference, with palliatives being diverted for personal gain or used as political tools. To ensure fairness and equity, a more structured distribution process is necessary, one that involves all major political parties and prioritises the needs of the people over political affiliations.
In the case of Edo State, with 192 wards, the 1,200 bags sent by the federal government would translate to only six bags per ward, highlighting the inadequacy of the current approach. A more collaborative and equitable distribution process would ensure that a larger quantity of palliatives reaches the people.
For instance, if two bags of 25kg each are allocated to the three major political parties, this would leave 12 ward executive council members with approximately 4 kg of rice each, a quantity that could barely sustain a family of five for two meals. In contrast, if the federal government collaborates with state and local governments as previously suggested, a family could receive a more substantial 7 kg of rice, making a more significant impact.
While the federal government’s intentions are commendable, the current approach to palliatives requires a rethink. Collaboration with state and local governments, fairness in distribution, and prioritisation of the people’s needs over political interests are essential to make a meaningful impact on the lives of Nigerians.
The federal government’s initiatives have, however, faced widespread criticism due to the meagre quantity allocated to beneficiaries, leading to public disdain and accusations of insincerity. Rather than appreciation, citizens have expressed disappointment and frustration, with some even suggesting that the federal government’s efforts are a mere distraction or a means to curry favour with contractors.
This criticism highlights the need for collaborative efforts in addressing the challenges at hand. While the federal government bears significant responsibility, it is equally important to scrutinise the roles of state governors who have been empowered to provide palliatives and support. Unfortunately, some governors have been remiss in their duties, deflecting pressure onto the federal government.
As the next line of defence after local governments, state governors must demonstrate accountability and take proactive measures to address the needs of their constituents. Abdicating their responsibilities to the federal government is unacceptable. It is essential for state governors to recognise their critical role in providing support and services, especially in the absence of local government autonomy.
Once the new law takes effect, local governments are expected to assume their rightful position as the first line of defence. Until then, state governors must step up their efforts to provide meaningful assistance and support, rather than relying solely on the federal government. By doing so, they can help alleviate the pressure on the federal government and work towards finding comprehensive solutions to the challenges facing citizens.Â
- business a.m. commits to publishing a diversity of views, opinions and comments. It, therefore, welcomes your reaction to this and any of our articles via email: comment@businessamlive.com
