Why factories, not frameworks will determine whether the AfCFTA becomes a platform for value creation or a highway for imports.
It started the way many ideas do these days, with a casual LinkedIn scroll. Afreximbank had posted a poll asking what Africa should prioritise to unlock more trade and investment. The options were familiar: industrialisation, trade logistics, MSME financing, and cross border payments. But long after we closed the app, the question stayed with us.
We realised the poll wasn’t simply gathering opinions. It was holding up a mirror to the continent. So we decided to write a short four part series, beginning with the one lever that shapes everything else: industrialisation.
Part 1: Industrialisation
The foundation Africa can no longer delay
Industrialisation is not just one item on a long to do list. It is the list. Without it, logistics is simply moving other people’s products more efficiently. MSME financing becomes import financing. Cross border payments make it easier for capital to leave the continent.
And the numbers make the case even clearer. Africa’s industrial gap is still stark. UNCTAD’s Economic Development in Africa Report 2024 shows that Africa accounts for less than two percent of global manufacturing output, a figure that has barely budged in twenty years. The continent’s share of global manufacturing exports is still under one percent, compared to 17 percent in East Asia.
UNIDO’s Industrial Development Report 2024 adds that manufacturing contributes only 10 to 12 percent to Africa’s GDP, far below the 20 to 30 percent seen in regions that have successfully industrialised. And according to the African Development Bank, Africa’s manufacturing value added per capita has grown by less than one percent annually since 2010. Asia, during its industrial rise, grew at more than six percent a year.
This isn’t because Africa lacks potential. It is because Africa lacks coordinated, value chain driven industrial policy.
The cost of remaining a raw materials continent is well documented. Afreximbank’s Africa in Figures 2024 highlights a pattern that has barely changed in two decades: Africa exports raw materials and imports manufactured goods. The World Bank estimates that over 70 percent of Africa’s exports are still primary commodities, while more than 80 percent of imports are manufactured products. This imbalance drains foreign exchange, limits job creation and leaves economies exposed to global price swings. The IMF estimates that commodity dependent economies lose up to two percentage points of GDP growth during downturns in global prices.
Industrialisation is the only structural way out of this cycle. And this is where Africa’s integration story reveals its deepest contradiction, one that policymakers rarely articulate but practitioners feel every day.
Africa integrated markets faster than it integrated production
One of the clearest diagnoses of Africa’s trade dilemma comes not from theory but from experience. In a recent conversation with Erastus Mwencha, who spent decades shaping Africa’s trade and integration agenda, the problem was distilled into a single sentence: Africa integrated markets faster than it integrated production.
This insight helps explain a persistent paradox. The continent has made remarkable progress on trade architecture, customs unions, free trade areas, and now the African Continental Free Trade Area, yet industrial transformation has lagged. Borders have opened, but factories have not scaled at the same pace. Demand has been liberalised; supply has not been built.
Trade agreements, Mwencha noted, were never meant to be an end in themselves. They were instruments designed to support industrialisation by enlarging markets, encouraging specialisation, and enabling African firms to achieve scale. When that sequencing is reversed, liberalisation does not catalyse production. It exposes its absence.
The result is visible across the continent. Imports rise faster than exports. Trade deficits widen. Logistics improvements accelerate the movement of finished goods produced elsewhere. Finance follows consumption rather than production. Integration deepens, but competitiveness does not.
This is not an argument against trade facilitation, cross border payments, or SME finance. It is an argument about order. Efficiency without production merely increases velocity. Liquidity without factories fuels imports. Markets without industrial capacity reward the already industrialised.
Mwencha’s warning is therefore strategic, not nostalgic. Industrialisation is not about replicating the past; it is about anchoring the future. Without a productive base, Africa risks turning the AfCFTA into a highly efficient consumption zone rather than a platform for value creation.
The lesson is clear. Africa’s integration agenda must be regrounded in production: specialised industrial parks, regional value chains, and export linked manufacturing clusters. Trade, logistics, and finance should follow, not substitute for, this foundation.
Integration creates opportunity. Industrialisation determines who captures it.
Why industrialisation must come first
- Industrial parks anchored in real value chains
Africa’s industrial future won’t be built through scattered factories. It will come from specialised, export linked industrial parks, agro processing zones, mineral beneficiation hubs, textile clusters, pharmaceutical parks.
We have already seen what’s possible. Ethiopia’s industrial parks have attracted more than 1.5 billion dollars in investment and created over 80,000 jobs. Morocco’s automotive clusters helped the country become Africa’s largest car exporter, producing more than 700,000 vehicles in 2023.
Industrial parks create scale, reduce costs, and attract investors who would never consider isolated locations.
- Regional specialisation instead of everyone doing everything
Africa doesn’t need 54 versions of the same industrial base.
- East Africa in agro processing
- Southern Africa in minerals and battery precursors
- West Africa in textiles and petrochemicals
- North Africa in automotive components and electronics
This is how Asia did it, through complementarity, not duplication. ASEAN’s regional value chains helped push intra regional trade from 19 percent in 1990 to over 25 percent today.
- Trade policy should follow industrial strategy
Africa often signs trade agreements first and then tries to build productive capacity later. It should be the other way around. Industrialisation should determine what Africa trades, not the reverse. The AfCFTA Secretariat estimates that intra African trade could double by 2035, but only if countries build competitive production capacity.
- Financing without production only fuels imports
MSME financing is essential, but without industrial capacity, most of that capital simply pays for imported goods. The African Development Bank notes that over 60 percent of SME loans in Africa end up financing imports.
The AfCFTA is a market. But markets reward producers.
The AfCFTA opens access to a 1.4 billion person market with a combined GDP of 3.4 trillion dollars. But markets don’t reward participation. They reward production. Without industrial capacity, Africa risks becoming a tariff free consumption zone for goods produced elsewhere and routed through African ports. Re exports into Africa through third countries are already estimated at 70 to 90 billion dollars a year.
A new industrial mindset: Strategic autonomy
Africa cannot afford to be pulled into the East West rivalry. The continent needs a posture of strategic autonomy, one that protects African interests, strengthens African value chains, and builds African competitiveness. Industrialisation is the backbone of that autonomy. Without it, Africa will always negotiate from a position of weakness.
Where we go next: Everything Africa wants, cheaper logistics, stronger SMEs, seamless payments, deeper trade, collapses without factories. Integration without production simply accelerates the inflow of goods made elsewhere. Industrialisation flips the script. It turns the AfCFTA from a consumption corridor into a manufacturing platform. It is the difference between participating in global markets and shaping them. The next three parts of this series build on one truth: Africa cannot trade what it does not produce, and it cannot transform what it does not make.
Coming up next: Trade logistics, and the role it plays in turning production into prosperity.
Phanice Mogaka is a public affairs advisor and pan‑African development advocate known for her work in diplomacy, strategic communications, and shaping narratives that advance Africa’s political and economic agency. Dr. Wale Osofisan is a governance strategist, international development expert, and policy analyst recognised for his thought leadership on Africa’s political economy, trade systems and development futures.
- business a.m. commits to publishing a diversity of views, opinions and comments. It, therefore, welcomes your reaction to this and any of our articles via email: comment@businessamlive.com
New crude, old questions: Can oil reform deliver fiscal transparency?