Equitable Mental Health: Action for public and private sector leaders
Joshua Awesome is a Coaching Psychologist/Executive and Business Performance Coach who has supported over 100,000 professionals across Africa and the globe. He can be reached via: joshua@mindinstitute.africa
October 16, 2023341 views0 comments
In a recent endeavour, I had the privilege of hosting the African Mental Health First Aid and Symposium for Leaders, where critical insights emerged from a fellow researcher’s Ph.D. work in Kenya. The focal point of discussion revolved around designing treatment programmes that address the economic inequalities faced by key and vulnerable populations. The symposium not only shed light on the challenges but also underscored the imperative for leaders in both the public and private sectors to play a pivotal role in crafting solutions.
Reflection 1
Available resources and internal innovation
The first reflection for leaders is rooted in the recognition that designing effective mental health treatment programmes requires a dual perspective — looking around to the resources available externally and looking within for solutions to unique challenges. In addressing economic disparities, leaders must tap into existing resources, fostering collaboration across sectors. Public and private entities can join forces to create multi-sectoral approaches that deliver a comprehensive response to populations facing compounded vulnerabilities. By leveraging collective resources, leaders can bridge gaps and amplify the impact of mental health initiatives.
Read Also:
Treatment approaches for economic inclusion
The second reflection delves into the need for innovative treatment approaches that directly tackle economic inequalities. Recommendations from the symposium highlight the efficacy of longer-acting molecules in reducing treatment-seeking barriers, hospital costs, and stays during admissions. Leaders should consider incorporating such solutions into mental health programmes, recognising the economic impact of treatment choices. Moreover, embedding vocational training and sustainable livelihoods within decentralised, low-threshold models can provide a holistic approach to mental health, addressing both psychological well-being and economic empowerment for vulnerable populations.
Reflection 3:
Community interventions and overcoming stigma
The third reflection emphasizes the importance of community-based interventions with proximity to clients. By strengthening ties between mental health services and communities, leaders can enhance accessibility. Simultaneously, addressing stigma at the community level is paramount. Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) play a crucial role in this aspect, serving as advocates for stigma reduction and breaking down barriers to treatment. Leaders should actively engage with CSOs, recognising their role in fostering an environment where mental health services are not only available but also accepted by all.
Conclusion:
Balancing constraints for inclusive services
In conclusion, public mental health services are invaluable, yet they grapple with the intricate dance of political and economic constraints. Leaders in both public and private sectors must champion equitable resourcing to ensure services that are accessible, affordable, available, accommodating, and acceptable. Identifying and minimizing hidden costs for diverse populations is essential, particularly for those predisposed to mental and substance use disorders. As leaders navigate these challenges, they are encouraged to embrace low-threshold, decentralized models that integrate vocational training and sustainable livelihoods, paving the way for inclusive mental health solutions.
In the ever-evolving landscape of mental health, leaders hold the key to unlocking transformative approaches that not only address the immediate needs of vulnerable populations but also create sustainable, inclusive solutions for a brighter, healthier future.