JOHN ONYEUKWU
John Onyeukwu , is a lawyer and public policy analyst with interdisciplinary expertise in law, governance, and institutional reform. He holds an LL.B (Hons) from Obafemi Awolowo University, an LL.M from the University of Lagos, and dual master’s degrees in Public Policy from the University of York and Central European University. He also earned a Mini-MBA. John has managed development projects on governance, public finance, civic engagement, and service delivery. He can be reached on john@apexlegal.com.ng
Why institutions, not ideology, determine national outcomes
In the past four decades, Nigeria’s economic path has been defined by a deep and persistent commitment to neoliberal policy prescriptions, privatisation, deregulation, fiscal austerity, and trade liberalization, often under the ideological supervision of the World Bank and IMF. From the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) of the 1980s to today’s removal of subsidies and currency floatation, successive governments have followed the same gospel: the market knows best. Yet, if there is any lesson to be drawn from our turbulent trajectory, it is this: markets, if left alone, will not save us; institutions, if hollowed out, will betray us.
Adopting a Philosophy, Politics, and Economics (PPE) lens allows for a richer, multidimensional critique of this orthodoxy. It reveals how economic policy, far from being a neutral technocratic exercise, is deeply political and ethical. Neoliberalism often pretends to stand above politics, claiming to be grounded in objective economic laws. But this illusion is dangerous. It obscures the social consequences of reform and evades accountability for its human impact.
Of market as an insufficient mechanism
Classical and neoliberal economic theory asserts that free markets, driven by self-interest and competition, will produce optimal outcomes. In Nigeria, this has justified the privatisation of public utilities, the deregulation of fuel prices, and a general retreat of the state from developmental responsibilities. But these policies have produced inflation, inequality, jobless growth, and widespread economic insecurity.
Markets are not moral agents. They do not ensure justice, nor do they protect the vulnerable. In a society marked by widespread poverty, low financial literacy, and deep structural inequalities, markets tend to concentrate power and wealth in the hands of the few. What emerges is not a level playing field, but a captured economy — dominated by rent-seeking elites, monopolists, and foreign capital. Basic services like electricity, housing, and education become inaccessible to the majority.
Instead of unleashing innovation and competition, reforms often entrench crony capitalism. The 2013 power sector privatisation, hailed as a landmark reform, has failed to deliver. A decade later, Nigerians still endure unreliable electricity, unaffordable tariffs, and a regulatory environment lacking transparency or measurable benchmarks. Consumers bear the cost of reform while private actors reap the benefits.
As Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz warned, “The reason the invisible hand is invisible is because it is often not there.”
Of the hollowing of institutions
Political theory teaches us that institutions are not mere bureaucracies. They are the foundation of legitimacy, trust, and collective order. When neoliberal reforms are introduced without inclusive consultation or adequate social cushioning, they don’t just fail economically, they damage the very institutions that should uphold the public interest.
Nigeria’s regulatory agencies, civil service, judiciary, and state-owned enterprises are frequently underfunded, politicised, and structurally weak. In this hollowed-out state, they cannot enforce contracts fairly, regulate markets effectively, or protect citizens from exploitation. Instead, they are co-opted as tools of elite accumulation. Corruption flourishes not in spite of reforms, but sometimes because of them.
As development economist Dani Rodrik reminds us, “Markets are embedded in institutions. Without the latter, the former cannot function properly.” This insight is especially urgent in Nigeria, where policy reforms often fail because they are not matched by institution-building. Agencies meant to ensure transparency and competition are themselves unaccountable. Courts are slow, often inaccessible, and susceptible to external pressures. Public procurement systems are riddled with inefficiencies and rent-seeking. The consequence is an erosion of public trust, which undermines both democracy and economic progress.
In such an environment, citizens increasingly turn to informal systems, ethnic affiliations, religious structures, or outright criminal networks, for protection and opportunity. What we face is not a free society, but a fragile one.
The ethical betrayal
Philosophically, the neoliberal project in Nigeria raises profound ethical questions: Who benefits from reform? Who is asked to sacrifice? What obligations does the state have to its citizens?
According to John Rawls’s theory of justice, a policy is only just if it benefits the least advantaged members of society. Under that test, much of Nigeria’s reform agenda fails. Likewise, Amartya Sen’s capabilities approach reminds us that true development must be about expanding real freedoms, not just boosting aggregate growth or attracting foreign capital.
Too often, reforms have imposed suffering on the poor without providing paths to opportunity. Fuel price hikes, for instance, disproportionately hurt those who rely on public transportation or informal livelihoods. Meanwhile, political elites and corporate actors shield themselves through subsidies, tax exemptions, and access to privileged markets.
The moral failure of the Nigerian neoliberal experiment lies not only in its outcomes but in its assumptions: that the poor must bear the brunt of reform, and that public suffering is the price of future prosperity. But this prosperity seldom comes, at least not for the many.
Toward a renewed social compact
The answer is not to reject markets or institutions, but to rebuild both, deliberately and equitably. Markets must be governed by strong, transparent institutions. Institutions must be independent, trusted, and responsive. Reforms must be designed with public participation, rooted in democratic legitimacy, and focused on outcomes that matter to ordinary Nigerians — jobs, security, health, education, dignity.
We need a new development paradigm, one that balances economic liberalisation with social protection; one that places inclusion, ethics, and sustainability at its centre. This requires investing in regulatory capacity, judicial reform, and civic institutions, not just adjusting exchange rates or tweaking fuel prices.
Nigeria’s problems are complex, but they are not beyond solving. They demand intellectual honesty, moral courage, and a political will that puts people above profits.
- business a.m. commits to publishing a diversity of views, opinions and comments. It, therefore, welcomes your reaction to this and any of our articles via email: comment@businessamlive.com
Electronic transmission: Electoral umpires should learn from Nigerian banks