Parts 1 and 2 established two foundational principles: cost-reflective tariffs require independently verifiable data, and true consumer protection begins with measurement rather than administration.
This raises a fundamental question: What exactly should regulators be measuring?
For decades, electricity regulation in Nigeria has operated at the distribution company (DisCo) level. Regulators evaluate aggregate metrics: total energy received, total energy billed, total revenue collected, overall losses, and utility-wide service levels.
While useful for macro oversight, this approach suffers from a fatal flaw: it treats an entire distribution company as a single operating unit.
In reality, the fundamental operational unit of a distribution network is the feeder. Until regulators shift their focus to feeder-level oversight, the sector’s core inefficiencies will remain hidden.
The flaw of aggregate statistics
Imagine a DisCo serving one million customers across hundreds of feeders. Within that single utility network, performance varies wildly:
High-performing feeders achieve low losses, excellent collection rates, and reliable supply.
Poor-performing feeders suffer from severe energy theft, dismal collections, and chronic outages.
When reported as utility-wide averages, these operational differences disappear.
A DisCo reporting 35 percent aggregate losses, 70 percent collection efficiency, and 15 hours average daily supply conceals the true reality:
Feeder A may achieve 10 percent losses, 95 percent collection efficiency, and 22 hours of daily supply.
Feeder B may record 55 percent losses, 40 percent collection efficiency, and less than six hours of supply.
Macro averages reveal almost nothing about operational realities on the ground. And what remains hidden cannot be effectively regulated.
Every feeder is an independent business unit
Emerging state regulators must embrace a strategic shift: viewing every feeder as a distinct business unit.
Every feeder possesses its own customer base, energy inflows and outflows, revenue profile, loss levels, operating costs, and service quality indicators. In effect, every feeder has its own profit-and-loss statement. Some generate strong cash flows, while others destroy value. Some attract private investment, while others repel it.
Currently, regulators cannot distinguish value-creating feeders from value-destroying ones—not because the data is impossible to obtain, but because traditional regulatory frameworks were never designed to look that closely.
The mechanics of feeder-level oversight.
To improve service delivery and attract capital, state regulators must mandate monthly feeder performance reports tracking eight core metrics:
-
Energy received: Bulk power supplied at the feeder head.
-
Energy billed: Volume successfully metered and billed to end users.
-
Revenue collected: Actual cash recovered.
-
Technical losses: Infrastructure-related line and transformation losses.
-
Commercial losses: Non-technical losses from theft, meter bypass, and billing failures.
-
Collection efficiency: Billed revenue versus actual cash realisation.
-
Hours of supply: Actual duration of electricity delivered.
-
Customer complaints: Localised service quality metrics.
Why feeder-level regulation transforms the market
Focusing regulatory power at the feeder level delivers distinct structural advantages:
-
Exposes inefficiency: Pinpoints exact loss locations rather than debating broad utility averages.
-
Enforces accountability: Prevents utility managers from hiding under-performing assets behind aggregate figures.
-
De-risks investment: Identifies bankable network segments ready for expansion or urgent rehabilitation.
-
Empowers consumers: Provides localised performance visibility to end users.
-
Grounds tariff decisions: Replaces broad assumptions with verifiable, unit-level accounting.
Bench marking and public dashboards
Feeder-level data unlocks the power of comparative bench marking. When regulators compare feeder metrics across local government areas, franchise zones, or states, performance gaps become glaringly obvious. Bench marking transforms regulation from theoretical analysis into active performance management.
State regulators should publish this data via a central State Electricity Performance Dashboard. Public visibility creates healthy market pressure: consumers know how their service compares to neighbouring areas, investors locate viable opportunities, utilities operate under continuous observation, and regulators build public credibility.
Unlocking feeder franchising and private capital
Perhaps the most significant commercial benefit of feeder-level regulation is that it creates the foundation for competitive franchising.
A regulator cannot franchise what it cannot measure. Before a feeder can be concessioned or sub-franchised to an independent operator, capital providers require precise data on its customer density, consumption profile, loss levels, collection history, and cash flow potential.
Feeder-level energy accounting transforms raw network assets into bankable investment vehicles. Without granular data, franchising is mere speculation; with granular data, it becomes financeable commercial reality.
Conclusion
For too long, power sector regulation in Nigeria has operated at an altitude far too high to fix grassroots failures.
Emerging state regulators must move closer to the point of service delivery—closer to the customer, closer to the network, and closer to the data. The feeder is where electricity is delivered, where losses occur, where revenue is collected, and where consumers experience utility performance.
The path to an investable, efficient, and transparent electricity market begins with a fundamental operational pivot: Stop regulating averages. Start regulating feeders.
Next Week: Part 4: Rewarding Performance, Not Expenditure
- business a.m. commits to publishing a diversity of views, opinions and comments. It, therefore, welcomes your reaction to this and any of our articles via email: comment@businessamlive.com
Masah Emmanuel Ikus is a Power and Energy Infrastructure Strategist and the Principal Consulting Partner at EMI Resources Limited. A University of Lagos-trained Electrical Engineer with an EMBA from Lagos Business School, he possesses over 27 years of experience managing complex infrastructure projects across the ICT, Oil & Gas, and Power sectors, specialising in the design of decentralised power systems and solar integration. He currently advises investors, project sponsors, and public institutions on leveraging Nigeria’s energy deficit into bankable commercial opportunities. He can be contacted via masahikus@gmail.com
How bad leaders engender brain drain in Nigeria