Anyone familiar with Nigeria’s commodities ecosystem would likely cringe at President Bola Tinubu’s recent remarks at the African CEO Forum in Kigali, Rwanda, where he advocated a Pan-African Commodity Exchange to boost trade across the continent. While the idea is laudable, he presented it as though commodity exchanges were entirely new to Nigeria and much of Africa. Even more comic was his response to the moderator’s question on why Africa has not developed a central commodities market.
The Kigali episode, now widely circulated, is troubling because Nigeria is not new to the commodities exchange conversation. The country has experimented with it for decades. The Abuja Securities and Commodities Exchange, later renamed the Nigeria Commodity Exchange (NCX), was established in the 1990s. Yet, after years of policy inconsistency, weak infrastructure, regulatory uncertainty, and official neglect, it has remained largely on life support.
More striking is that while the government-owned exchange struggles, private-sector operators have advanced. Nigeria now has at least five licensed commodities exchanges. This shows the problem has never been a lack of ideas or institutions, but the absence of sustained political will and strategic understanding at the highest levels.
That a Nigerian president could speak of commodity exchanges as though they were futuristic reflects a shallow appreciation among policymakers of how modern commodity markets drive economic transformation. Globally, commodity exchanges are not merely trading platforms; they are engines of price discovery, agricultural industrialisation, export competitiveness, financial inclusion, and wealth creation.
Countries such as Brazil, South Africa, and India have used commodity exchanges strategically. Brazil’s agricultural futures markets helped transform it into one of the world’s largest exporters of soybeans, coffee, and sugar. South Africa’s derivatives market, developed through the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, plays a central role in pricing and risk management across Southern Africa. India’s multi-commodity exchanges have deepened access for farmers, processors, and exporters while improving transparency in agricultural trade.
Nigeria, by contrast, behaves like a country unaware of its economic potential despite vast agricultural and mineral resources. The absence of a vibrant commodities ecosystem means farmers suffer heavy post-harvest losses, producers lack transparent pricing systems, processors face unstable raw material supply, and exporters struggle with standardisation and quality assurance. A properly functioning commodities exchange could change this. It would provide warehouse receipt systems allowing farmers to use stored produce as collateral for financing. It would improve price transparency and reduce exploitation by middlemen. Futures contracts would help producers and processors hedge against price volatility, while institutional investors could channel capital into agriculture and solid minerals. Ultimately, commodity exchanges would help reduce Nigeria’s dependence on crude oil revenue. For decades, policymakers have spoken about diversification without building the institutions required to achieve it. Commodity markets are among those essential institutions. There is some hope in the Investment and Securities Act (ISA) 2025, which expands recognition and regulation of specialised exchanges, including commodities and derivatives markets. However, legislation alone will not transform the economy. The government must move from legal frameworks to implementation.
Nigeria needs a national commodities market policy backed by strong presidential commitment. Commodity exchanges cannot thrive amid fragmented regulation and policy reversals. The government must invest in infrastructure such as certified warehouses, storage facilities, logistics corridors, and grading systems. Without these, exchange trading remains largely theoretical. Regulators should encourage participation by farmers, cooperatives, exporters, and financial institutions through tax incentives, credit guarantees, and simplified market access. The Central Bank of Nigeria and development finance institutions should integrate warehouse receipt financing into mainstream agricultural lending to unlock rural capital and deepen participation.
The federal government should also encourage states to align agricultural production clusters with exchange-traded commodities, integrating local economies into formal value chains. Investor education and public awareness must be intensified. Commodity exchange should not remain the language of elites in Lagos and Abuja. Farmers in Kano, cocoa producers in Ondo, sesame exporters in Jigawa, and miners in Nasarawa must understand how these markets work and benefit from them. Nigeria cannot continue reinventing concepts the world has operationalised for decades. Commodity exchange is not a novelty but a proven economic instrument.
- business a.m. commits to publishing a diversity of views, opinions and comments. It, therefore, welcomes your reaction to this and any of our articles via email: comment@businessamlive.com
Intrigues, policy somersaults as strategy against local refining